Back in January, Prince Harry published his first memoir, and the media made all the bombshell revelations contained in its pages.
The parts that attracted the most attention concerned the strained relationship between the Duke of Sussex and his disapproving family.
(Though Harry’s frostbitten “togger” earned some headlines, too.)
But it’s these mostly undiscovered routes that could soon land Prince in trouble with the law.
As we reported yesterday, legal experts have expressed concern that Harry’s admission of drug use could threaten his legal right to remain in the United States.
The Duke is not a US citizen, and visitors’ visas can be revoked at any time if authorities are made aware of the recipient’s criminal conduct.
The 38-year-old California resident says her partying days are long behind her, but some lawyers have claimed the US government still has the right to boot her, as Harry’s book recounts several incidents. Has been in which he used drugs. American Soil.
British tabloid vultures love to blame Meghan Markle for anything negative in Harry’s life, so it should come as no surprise that the bottom-feeder is no longer keeping her husband from speaking openly about his past substance abuse. Criticizing the Duchess for stopping.
“I don’t understand why his wife didn’t warn him,” royal biographer Angela Levin told journalist Dan Wootton during a recent interview for GB News.
“He talked to her about everything he was going to say. He’s in charge as we both know.
“She didn’t say ‘be careful, because if you talk too much about drugs, you could get in trouble,'” Levin said, “wondering” about why “she singled him out on this.” left.”
“The mental health gurus who were talking to her should have already said, ‘Don’t talk about drugs,'” the royal expert said.
“He made his life extremely difficult.”
The concern about Harry’s possible deportation is mostly the result of comments made this week by former federal prosecutor Nima Rahmani, who Page Six says should be worried about Harry getting booted from SoCal.
“Admission of drug use is usually grounds for inadmissibility,” Rahmani said.
“This means that Prince Harry’s visa should be refused or revoked because he admitted to using cocaine, mushrooms and other drugs.”
Rahmani states that “there is no exception for royalty or recreational use.”
To be clear, Harry almost certainly would No Should be deported because he once ate shrooms during a party at Courteney Cox’s house.
but if he does is sent back to the UK, you can be sure a bunch of weirdo fanatics will be more than happy to blame his wife!